this bottle should be double indemnity. Knowing the liquor was adulterated liquor

After drinks in the hotel to the fake maotai, consumer one-time purchase of a 17. Zhang Hotel prosecution to court ordered double indemnity. 　　Yesterday was informed that the Haidian District Court held that "impact" is not part of needs does not support double indemnity. This year the Baiyun hotel dining drinking a bottle of 1488 when 53 fly in Guizhou maotai liquor. After dinner, he purchased 17 bottles of wine and identification sent to gongshangsuo. Qualified, he purchased was not moutai (600,519) wine production company limited. 　　Then, make the hotel sued on the Court, request the Decree of the hotels double indemnity 18 bottles of wine is worth a total of $ 53,568. Proceedings, Mr Zhang said, He has found in hotel the first bottle the liquor was adulterated liquor, one-time purchase 17 bottles in order to "fake". The Court held that the fraud operators offering goods or services, shall, in accordance with the requirements of consumers double indemnity. But this "consumer" refers to the need to buy for your life or the goods or services of the individual. Hotel purchasing1 bottle of maotai liquor and drinking, belonging to the need to purchase merchandise for your life, this bottle should be double indemnity. Knowing the liquor was adulterated liquor swtor power leveling, and "fake" for the purpose of buying 17 bottles of wine star wars the old republic power leveling, not part of the need to purchase merchandise for your life, it requires double indemnity, should not be supported. Finally, the Court Hotel refund the purchase price $ 26,784 and compensate for the loss of the first bottle of wine $ 1488.